New "Oldest Human" Teeth

"Ancient Teeth May 'Change Whole Picture of Evolution' "
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/12/27/ancient-teeth-change-picture-evolution/?test=faces
 "Researcher say teeth go back 400,00 years; others say claim is premature"
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40820248/ns/technology_and_science-science/?gt1=43001
"Ancient Human Remains Found in Israel"
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101227/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_israel_ancient_teeth

Thanks to Shane, GW, Karl and Pete for these links.

So, you might be wondering -- what's the big deal? It's just another human tooth? It's big, as usual, to an evolutionist -- because, as usual, it totally throws off their evo-story -- again!

A definitely human tooth was found near Tel-Aviv in Israel, that evo's dated at 400,000 yrs. How did they know? Simple -- the evo's just "dated them according to the layers of earth where they were found". (MSNBC 12/27/10)  (Once again, evo's feel no need to justify the "circular reasoning" of dating fossils by rocks and dating rocks by fossils.)

Well, since it's twice as old as it's "supposed to be" ... how come they're so sure it's not a monkey tooth? That's easy. Simian molars have a Y-indented crown while humans have an X-indentation on the top of each molar. That's why the evo's are "punting" and saying this "must" be a Neanderthal tooth (since they've all admitted now that Neanders were really humans, just like we creationists have been saying for decades). 

But why is this such an evo-worry for them? The accepted theory is that Homo sapiens originated in Africa and migrated out 80,000 years ago ... the remains could mean that modern humans in fact originated in what is now Israel. (MSNBC) So that means human migration --didn't-- fan out from Africa ... but maybe more like (gee, I dunno) where Mount Ararat and the Tower of Babel were ??! ... and not only that human origins are geographically where the Bible says but ... that they're much closer back to the beginning than the evo's thought ??!  Yeah -- I'd be worried too -- if I hadda believe -- what they believe in!  You keep the faith!  You keep thinking.  DrJ

Make Your Stand Alongside DrJ ( by "follower" Vicaronaroll )

Standing up against the scientific bigotry of the evo-siths

Deuteronomy 31:6 "Be strong and courageous, do not be afraid or tremble at them, for the LORD your God is the one who goes with you. He will not fail you or forsake you."

Joshua 1:9 "Have I not commanded you? Be strong and courageous! Do not tremble or be dismayed, for the LORD your God is with you wherever you go."

My [fellow] young brothers in Christ,

I stand shoulder-to-shoulder and as one in spirit with Dr. J and your other older brothers in this web-community encouraging you to not fear those who belittle, badger, and bully any who are independent enough in their thinking and beliefs to challenge the unscientific and unverifiable lies of Darwinistic macro-evolution.  Their so-called scholarship and expertise in matters of the origins of the universe and life on our little planet have been and are continually being successfully challenged and refuted by others in their own scientific community who also happen to be believers in the Lord Jesus Christ and the universal, eternal and absolute truths of the Bible, from Genesis 1:1 to Revelation 22:21 and all points in between.

And here is a little quote from the evo-siths’ own god, Charles Darwin himself, that you might use against any who are unwilling to give any and all theoretical perspectives, including the Genesis creation account, the only extant eye-witness account of the origin of the universe and life on earth, a fair, unbiased, objective, and thorough examination: “A fair result can be obtained only by fully stating and balancing the facts and arguments on both sides of each question.”  (from the Introduction of The Origin of Species by Charles Darwin)  Or as God puts it so very much better, “A wise man will hear and increase in learning, and a man of understanding will acquire wise counsel” (Proverbs 1:5) and “He who gives an answer before he hears, it is folly and shame to him.” (Proverbs 18:13)

I encourage you to:

1. Expose yourself to as much of the wise counsel that God has enabled men like Dr. J to amass for the defense of Genesis chapters 1-11, including the biblical account of creation and the universal flood of Noah’s day;

2. Become proficient at its use as Jedi knights in the battle for truth against the powers of darkness and their minions within the atheistic, materialistic, evolutionist camp of the scientific community;

3. Never cease asking questions of all sides of the issues, listening with a discerning but inquisitive heart, mind, and spirit.

4. Pass on to others what you have learned.

“Finally, be strong in the Lord and in the strength of His might.  Put on the full armor of God, so that you will be able to stand firm against the schemes of the devil.  For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the powers, against the world forces of this darkness, against the spiritual forces of wickedness in the heavenly places.  Therefore, take up the full armor of God, so that you will be able to resist in the evil day, and having done everything, to stand firm.  

“Stand firm therefore, HAVING GIRDED YOUR LOINS WITH TRUTH, and HAVING PUT ON THE BREASTPLATE OF RIGHTEOUSNESS, and having shod YOUR FEET WITH THE PREPARATION OF THE GOSPEL OF PEACE; in addition to all, taking up the shield of faith with which you will be able to extinguish all the flaming arrows of the evil one.  And take THE HELMET OF SALVATION, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God.  With all prayer and petition pray at all times in the Spirit, and with this in view, be on the alert with all perseverance and petition for all the saints, and pray on [your own] behalf, that utterance may be given to [you] in the opening of [your] mouth, to make known with boldness the mystery of the gospel, for which [you are] an ambassador in chains; that in proclaiming it [you] may speak boldly, as [you] ought to speak.”  (Ephesians 6:10-20, changes respectfully made)   

Your fellow bond-servant of the Lord Jesus Christ,

vicaronaroll

note from DrJ

you can do these things Vic suggests at 4 web-communities run by DrJ

1 -- this one at  www.DrJ-PointsofOrigins.blogspot.com  for your creation-evolution news updates.

2 -- and/or at  www.TheApprenticeCreationist.blogspot.com  for those who are new to this topic.

3 -- and/or at  www.TheJediCreationist.blogspot.com  for those who are further along in this topic.

4 -- and/or at  www.TheCreationistCrossroads.blogspot.com  for those working in the field (advanced).

Oh just  "Subscribe"  to them all -- ha, ha -- and become a  "Follower"  on every one of them!

More on no-Arsenic Life !

NASA's claim of a "new form of life" found "evolving" on Earth ... has really gotten blasted big-time by other scientists around the world.  Read the whole thing at 

http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_thelookout/20101208/sc_yblog_thelookout/scientists-poking-holes-in-nasas-arsenic-eating-microbe-discovery   (Thanks G W for this source!)

But here are some of the rebuttals -- they didn't find -- any such thing as "a new life form evolving!"


"I was outraged at how bad the science was," University of British Columbia 

when NASA scientists removed the DNA from the bacteria for examination, they didn't take the steps necessary to wash away other types of molecules. That means, according to the critics, that the arsenic may have merely clung to the bacteria's DNA for a ride without becoming truly ingrained into it.

NASA scientists fed the bacteria salts that contained trace amounts of phosphate, so it's possible that the bacteria were able to survive on those tiny helpings of phosphate instead of the arsenic.

"This paper should not have been published," University of Colorado 

"I suspect that NASA may be so desperate for a positive story that they didn't look for any serious advice from DNA or even microbiology people," UC-Davis

Shrimp Gumbo

Okay guys, as spectacular as the evo-dated "360 mill yr old" shrimp fossil from OK was ... it was not all that we had expected.
I can find no verification of the shrimp "meat" nor of the shrimp "pigment" within the literature nor in the study reports.
The fine detail of the preservation of even the muscle fibers ... is still stunning and an embarrassment to the evo's (which they have tried to bolster up with their acid-water, still-water, deep-water explanations).
The age being pushed back "125 mill yrs" closer to the truth (the First Week of time on Earth) is good for us.
The fact that this shrimp isn't any different from shrimps today (even tho' fish changed into humans during this same amount of time, supposedly) is also good for us.
The find is good for us ... on the time and appearance points.
The find is inconclusive on the protein-preservation point.

However ... in 2006 ... complex biological pigment molecules ... had already been found in a supposedly 350 mill yr old crinoid ("sea lily") fossil.  Amen?  Amen.  God bless y'all.  Yer teacher, Dr Jackson

Arsenic-based life from "Space"? -- not

POINTS OF ORIGINS with Dr. Jackson  
Creation Truth Foundation www.CreationTruth.com
https://webmail.liberty.edu/owa/redir.aspx?C=d4f875837bab4a9d903b65b35e508ec4&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.politicsdaily.com%2f2010%2f12%2f04%2fdoes-a-new-life-form-mean-god-is-dead%2f%3ficid%3dmain%7cverizon%7cdl1%7csec1_lnk1%7c188214
Thanks Bonita, for the link from the LU source.
http://scienceblogs.com/webeasties/2010/12/guest_post_arsenate-based_dna.php
Thanks Ian, for this rebuttal source within the secular science community.

Ian Juby points out, the "new" DNA did not dissolve in water. If Arsenic (As) were in the backbone, it would have (instead of Phosphorus). 
Even evo-stih PZ Myers says that the case for implications against religion in this matter is way "overstated." 
This is of no concern nor import. Even if Arsenic in the DNA backbone were verified, it wouldn't proved evolution of life (just modification of it) 
and it wouldn't prove extraterrestrial life (unless assuming that it didn't come from Earth is valid, even though we found it on Earth). Keep thinking. DrJ